Business Case
Online Order Management System
Lubbock Florist
Prepared by: Scott Weeden
Date: July 15, 2025
Most Suitable Area of Impact
The most suitable area of impact is Operational. Lubbock Florist’s primary challenges stem from inefficient operational processes including:
- Manual order entry leading to duplicates
- Inadequate inventory tracking causing stockouts
- Time-consuming order fulfillment processes
Most Suitable Desired Value
The most suitable desired value is Better. The project aims to improve:
- Quality of business operations through automation
- Real-time inventory management
- Elimination of errors and inefficiencies
Appropriate Metrics
Metric | Current State | Target State |
---|---|---|
Order Processing Accuracy | 85% | 99% |
Inventory Accuracy | 60% | 95% |
Order Fulfillment Time | 45 min | 27 min |
Peak Season Stockouts | 8-10 incidents | 2-3 incidents |
Time Frame
6-Month Implementation Timeline
Implementation
Measurement
MOV Statement
“Improve operational efficiency by reducing order processing errors to less than 1% and decreasing order fulfillment time by 40% within 6 months of system implementation, while maintaining 95% inventory accuracy to prevent stockouts during peak seasons.”
Business Case Analysis
Step 1: Define MOV
The Measurable Organizational Value (MOV) for Lubbock Florist focuses on operational efficiency improvements that directly address their core business challenges.
MOV Components for Lubbock Florist
99% accuracy
40% time reduction
Cost savings
Customer satisfaction
Owner approval
Staff buy-in
System reports
KPI tracking
Step 2: Form Team
Role | Member | Responsibilities |
---|---|---|
Project Sponsor | Carlos (Owner) | Final decisions, budget approval, strategic alignment |
Project Manager | IT Consultant | Timeline management, coordination, risk management |
Lead Florist | Senior Designer | Process expertise, workflow design, training lead |
Operations Staff | Order Processor | Current system knowledge, testing, peer training |
Technical Support | Part-time IT | System setup, integration, ongoing support |
Step 3: Identify Alternatives
Solution Alternatives
Cloud-Based System
(Buy)
Custom Database
(Develop)
Enhanced Excel
(Remodel)
Status Quo
(Do Nothing)
Step 4: Assess Feasibility & Risk
The risk vs. feasibility analysis shows that Alternative 1 (Cloud System) offers the best balance of high feasibility with moderate risk.
Step 5: Calculate Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)
Cost Category | Alt 1 | Alt 2 | Alt 3 | Alt 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Direct Costs | ||||
Initial Setup | $1,000 | $20,000 | $3,500 | $0 |
Hardware | $500 | $1,000 | $1,000 | $0 |
Ongoing Costs (3 years) | ||||
Subscription/Maintenance | $10,800 | $3,600 | $0 | $0 |
Training | $500 | $1,000 | $500 | $0 |
Support | $0 | $2,400 | $1,000 | $0 |
Indirect Costs | ||||
Lost Productivity | $1,000 | $1,000 | $3,000 | $15,000 |
Stockout Losses | $500 | $500 | $2,000 | $10,000 |
Total 3-Year TCO | $14,300 | $29,500 | $11,500 | $25,000 |
Step 6: Estimate Total Benefits of Ownership (TBO)
Distribution of Benefits (Alternative 1)
- Labor Savings: 33.3%
- Error Reduction: 22.2%
- Inventory Optimization: 16.7%
- Peak Revenue Gains: 27.8%
Step 7: Analyze Alternatives
Metric | Alt 1 | Alt 2 | Alt 3 | Alt 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
3-Year Net Benefit | $39,700 | $24,500 | $15,500 | -$25,000 |
ROI | 278% | 83% | 135% | -100% |
Payback Period | 4 months | 16 months | 8 months | Never |
NPV (10% discount) | $33,421 | $16,832 | $11,234 | -$22,539 |
Criteria | Weight | Alt 1 | Alt 2 | Alt 3 | Alt 4 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROI | 25% | 9 | 2.25 | 6 | 1.50 | 7 | 1.75 | 0 | 0.00 |
Strategic Fit | 20% | 9 | 1.80 | 8 | 1.60 | 5 | 1.00 | 2 | 0.40 |
Risk Level | 15% | 8 | 1.20 | 4 | 0.60 | 6 | 0.90 | 3 | 0.45 |
Implementation | 15% | 9 | 1.35 | 3 | 0.45 | 7 | 1.05 | 10 | 1.50 |
Scalability | 15% | 9 | 1.35 | 7 | 1.05 | 4 | 0.60 | 1 | 0.15 |
User Adoption | 10% | 8 | 0.80 | 7 | 0.70 | 8 | 0.80 | 10 | 1.00 |
Total | 100% | 8.75 | 5.90 | 6.10 | 3.50 |
Step 8: Recommendation
Based on comprehensive analysis, Alternative 1 provides:
- Highest ROI at 278% with 4-month payback
- Lowest implementation risk
- Best strategic alignment with growth objectives
- Superior scoring model performance (8.75/10)
Iterative Implementation Plan
Project Overview
Project Name | Lubbock Florist Cloud System Implementation |
Duration | 6 months (26 weeks) |
Budget | $14,300 (3-year TCO) |
Expected ROI | 278% |
Payback Period | 4 months |
Implementation Phases
Six-Phase Implementation Approach
Initiation
Weeks 1-2
Setup
Weeks 3-6
Pilot
Weeks 7-10
Rollout
Weeks 11-14
Optimization
Weeks 15-18
Measurement
Weeks 19-26
Detailed Phase Plans
Phase 1: Project Initiation (Weeks 1-2)
Task | Description | Deliverable | Responsibility |
---|---|---|---|
Kick-off Meeting | Align stakeholders on project goals and MOV | Meeting minutes | Project Manager |
Vendor Evaluation | Research and compare cloud florist systems | Vendor comparison matrix | IT Consultant |
Current State Analysis | Document existing processes | Process flow diagrams | Operations Staff |
Requirements Gathering | Define system requirements | Requirements document | Team |
Phase 3: Pilot Testing (Weeks 7-10)
Pilot Testing Components
Phase 4: Full Rollout (Weeks 11-14)
Week | Activity | Success Criteria |
---|---|---|
Week 11 | Launch order management module | 100% orders in system |
Week 12 | Activate inventory tracking | Real-time stock updates |
Week 13 | Enable customer database | All customers migrated |
Week 14 | Go-live support and monitoring | <2% error rate |
Phase 5: Optimization (Weeks 15-18)
- Refine workflows based on user feedback
- Implement advanced features (reporting, analytics)
- Optimize system performance
- Conduct additional training sessions
Risk Management
Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation Strategy |
---|---|---|---|
User Resistance | Medium | High | Early involvement, comprehensive training, change champions |
Data Migration Issues | Low | High | Thorough testing, backup procedures, phased migration |
Vendor Reliability | Low | Medium | SLA agreements, regular backups, exit strategy |
Budget Overrun | Low | Medium | Fixed-price contract, clear scope, change control process |
Success Metrics Dashboard
Key Performance Indicators
Target: 99%
Target: 40%
Target: 95%
Target: 75%
The implementation of a cloud-based order management system represents a transformative opportunity for Lubbock Florist. With a projected ROI of 278% and a payback period of just 4 months, this investment will modernize operations, eliminate costly errors, and position the business for sustainable growth.
The iterative implementation approach ensures minimal disruption to daily operations while maximizing user adoption and system effectiveness. By following this comprehensive plan, Lubbock Florist will achieve its MOV of improved operational efficiency within the targeted 6-month timeframe.